UPDATE on EU-US trade deal negotiations

EU negotiators are optimistic that they can secure a place for financial services regulation as trade talks continue this week where regulatory compatibility for cosmetics is also on the agenda.

EU and US representatives and regulatory experts are currently holding detailed talks on sectors including cosmetics in a bid to enhance regulatory coherence and compatibility and possible elements for a chapter on technical barriers to trade going beyond WTO disciplines.

The continents launched negotiations on the so-called 'Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership' earlier this year, and Europe is hopeful that the deal will also include financial regulation and markets-related activity, since the EU and US account for 80% of global financial transactions.

However, there were doubts on the US side about whether financial regulation could be incorporated and only time will tell as the next round of talks will take place the week of 16 December, after which both parties will then take stock, identify areas of convergence and areas where political guidance might be needed.

Cosmetics on the agenda

Continuing from where they left off in the first round in July, EU & US reps discussed investment rules, trade in services, and energy and raw materials in regards to cosmetics.

We compared regulations on cosmetics in the EU and the US, since we know that certain cosmetic ingredients are prohibited in the EU convergence” between the positive and negative lists of cosmetic ingredients in the EU and the US," says EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht.

"Negotiators have their eyes on more than just removing the remaining low tariffs. The main hurdles to trade lie 'behind the border' in regulations, non-tariff barriers and red tap," she adds.

Efforts to align the trans-Atlantic divide on cosmetic standards

At the heart of the European regulation system is the "Precautionary Principle," which is enshrined in the EU treaty and gives its' regulators more license than their counterparts in the U.S. to restrict or ban substances that are believed to be harmful.

In essence, the EU system says that some chemicals are so hazardous that they shouldn't be used at all, while the U.S. system in many cases would keep them on the market, so long as they aren't used in ways that would harm people.

Both sides are hoping that these talks will help to align their domestic standards in this instance, and that they will be able to set the benchmark for developing global rules – beneficial for both EU and US exporters, as well as for the multilateral trading system.

"We are making good and steady progress across the broad range of issues we need to tackle to make our transatlantic business environment more efficient and effective whilst preserving the protections and rights already in place for consumers,” De Gucht explains.